The Government’s White Paper, Planning for the Future, has caused great anger in local government. If this becomes law, it would deny many communities a say across the country in having a voice on planning issues that affect their daily lives. It could also mean for many smaller developments there would be no affordable housing. And in another blow, it would mean fewer environmental safeguards and action to tackle climate change.
Motion passed – 450 to 28 against at Federal Conference on Sun 27 September 2020
Consultation – Planning for the future
Closing date 29 October 11.45pm
Please encourage your residents, colleagues and Councillors to comment on this consultation.
Emergency motion: Opposing the Government Power Grab on planning
Conference notes that:
A. The Government is consulting on to overhaul the planning system.
B. The reforms to existing planning rules would allow fast track permissions for offices and retail centres to be converted to houses; and extra storeys to be added to existing housing and flats.
C. The assessment of local housing need and the threshold below which developers are required to contribute to affordable housing will also be changed.
D. In the future reforms proposed in the Planning for the Future consultation published on the 6 August 2020, land will be categorised into growth, renewal or protection zones;
I. ‘Growth’ areas will allow planning permission in principle if a site is designated a development site in the local plan.
II. ‘Renewal’ areas will be subject to a statutory ‘presumption in favour of development’
III. ‘Protection’ areas will be where development will be discouraged.
E. The Government has already laid new regulations allowing Permitted Developments that do not provide adequate environmental standards to counter Climate Change dangers
i) The need to build more housing to prevent homelessness and provide adequate, affordable and suitable accommodation for everyone, and the failure of successive governments to address the issue.
ii) That councils currently approve nine in ten applications.
iii) That the Local Government Association findings show that over a million homes have planning permission but remain unbuilt.
Conference believes that:
a) The planning system is not the cause of low build-out numbers.
b) These proposals reduce democratic accountability and public scrutiny undermining the ability of councils to determine planning applications.
c) These proposals significantly reduce the scope for public participation and influence on planning applications within local communities.
d) The proposed changes would favour development interests over those of local communities.
e) Delegation of detailed planning decisions to planning officers, rather than a democratically elected planning committee fails to recognise the role that public democratic scrutiny has in ensuring decisions are fair, transparent, with any impacts fully considered.
f) The reforms restrict a planning authorities’ ability to set local planning policies in line with the needs of their area and community aspirations, undermining the plan-led system, disempowering councils and communities.
g) Replacing the Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 payments with centrally imposed housing targets and a national levy, will likely result in less money for affordable housing, sustainable transport and other critical infrastructure.
h) The effort to speed up applications risk watering down or removing the requirement altogether for Strategic Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Assessments and similar assessments.
i) The proposals do not sufficiently take into consideration the Climate Change Act 2008 provisions that address carbon dioxide emission standards for future housing stock.
j) The proposals put at risk archaeology and heritage by undermining pre-commencement archaeological conditions in the development process.
Conference reaffirms the commitment of the Liberal Democrats to:
1. Empower local democracy.
2. Provide the infrastructure the country needs.
3. Provide truly affordable good quality housing.
4. Support housing with high standards of design, amenity, space.
5. Achieve the smallest possible carbon footprint from housing.
Conference strongly objects to these proposals and urges all Liberal Democrats – including the party’s councillors, MPs in England and those elected at any other level – to participate in the consultations and to reject the arbitrary housing targets and reduction of local control proposed in the consultation paper.